๐ Smaller VC funds = better financial returns [research]
60 deep tech climate investors. 36 questions to fall in love? The Pygmalion effect. (#161)
Welcome to my free newsletter โ four short posts about climate tech startups and finance, plus the wisdom and humor we need along the way. Read the archives.
Not a subscriber? Sign up.
Feeling generous? Share this with a friend.
Climate Startups + Investors
1.
60 deep tech climate investors.
Our fellow ecosystem builders at HackSummit created this magical investor list.
It includes funds between $20M and $20B, plus sample portfolio companies.
Some are generalist investors with growing climate deep tech interest.
Others are solo GPs focused 100% on this niche.
LFG โ Make. It. Rain.
โ
2.
Smaller VC funds produce higher investment returns.
Size does matter. But not in the way you might think.
Our friends at Energy Transition Ventures analyzed VC fund financial performance on 237 US-based funds closed in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 (โvintagesโ) across four size categories:
$25โ100M
$101โ250M
$251Mโ1B
> $1B
The result?
The top 10% of funds show many smaller funds ($25โ100M) and no mega funds (>$1B).
Smaller VC funds matched or outperformed the other three size categories by net IRR in every vintage
This is reassuring news for newer, smaller funds carving out a niche in climate tech and impact sectors.
And perhaps a warning regarding how theyโll maintain high financial returns as they scale in future, bigger funds.
Personal Growth => Business Growth
3.
The Pygmalion effect.
This fancy term means we behave and perform better when people expect more of us.
How should we apply this to our teams?
Our children?
Ourselves?
Dig the science here.
Or sound super smart by referencing its origin โ the Greek myth of Pygmalion, โwhere a sculptor's great expectations for his statue resulted in it coming to life.โ
The opposite is also real โ stereotype threat.
Our negative views about someone based on their identity (e.g., race, gender) can hurt their performance.
No surprise, except that many of us do it unconsciously.
โ
4.
36 questions to fall in love (with a cofounder).
Psychologist Dr. Arthur Aron created these questions in 1997.
The goal was to speed up the process of creating intimacy between two strangers. (Whatโs the rush?)
I learned about them in the bookย Supercommunicators: How to Unlock the Secret Language of Connectionย by Charles Duhigg, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist.
The method:
Each person answers the same question aloud.
Answer all questions.
Allow at least 45 minutes.
Finally, stare into each otherโs eyes for four minutes. (gasp!)
Perhaps this could be used for your next offsite meeting, minus the fourth step.
See the full list of questions at PsychCentral.
How can I help you grow?
Join our private peer group for climate tech CEOs.
Talk to me about executive coaching.
Learn from 180+ climate CEOs and investors in our podcast.
Thatโs all, yโall.
Make it a great week because itโs usually a choice.
~ Chris
โ
Join 20,000+ climate tech entrepreneurs and investors who get actionable insights in our free newsletter. (Read the archives)