5 Comments

Can readily appreciate point 4, the time value of impact, when it comes to the timing of GHG emissions reductions and even removal.

Just wondering if there might be a clearer metaphor one might substitute for this? "2050 goals are great, like a local sushi restaurant in the U.S. with 4.1 out of 5 stars. But 2023 goals are better, like the best sushi restaurant in Tokyo, only known by locals." Maybe it's just me, maybe even likely so, but this was a head-scratcher.

Expand full comment